Article 56 TFEU, read in conjunction with Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related
rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member [...]
Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in
the information society must be interpreted as meaning that the provision of television sets installed in the rooms or in the fitness area of a hotel, where a signal [...]
Even if prior art discloses a higher-level concept of the patented invention, non-obviousness is not negated if the difficulty of composition is acknowledged. In the case of
so-called Markush claims (a patented invention claiming a compound which is not specifically disclosed but is included in the scope of substitutions, allowing the [...]
Article 102 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the adoption and implementation of rules by associations which are responsible for football at world and European levels
and which pursue in parallel various economic activities related to the organisation of competitions, making subject to their prior approval the setting up, on European [...]
The patrimonial rights of an author embodied in the creation of a derivative work – the product of transforming an original work – will, as a rule, be dependent on the
express prior authorisation of its owner [...]