AbstractYıldız Holding Anonim Şirketi v İbrahim Aslanyavrusu (2020) 11th Chamber of Turkish Court of Appeals Merit No: 2019/3006 E., No: 2020/841 K., 03 February 2020 Abstract

Yıldız Holding Anonim Şirketi v İbrahim Aslanyavrusu [...]

The authorNatali Goginashvili holds an LL.M in European Intellectual Property Law from Stockholm University and is currently attending a Master 2 Programme in Industrial Property

at Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas. This articleAlthough the drug repurposing strategy is far from new, it has gained considerable momentum in the last decade. [...]

Despite its omnipresence in the standard setting environment and a series of unparalleled litigations amongst almost all big players in the telecommunication industry over

the past decade or more, the legal construction of the ETSI FRAND declaration11 still remains obscure. [...]

European Commission, 2020, Making the most of the EU’s innovative potential An intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience, 25 November

2020 Brussels, COM(2020) 760 final. [...]

AbstractEU General Court, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), EU:T:2020:330, 8 July 2020 Abstract Teva Pharmaceutical

Industries Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) [...]

The authorThe author is a Patent Examiner at the UK Intellectual Property Office. The views expressed in the article are his own, and do not necessarily coincide with the views

of the UK IPO. [...]

AbstractLegal contexts frequently impose steep communication barriers, but because the law’s ontological framework of communication views it as an atomized, transaction phenomenon,

the law lacks the ability to conceptualize and describe the way in which it itself imposes systemic communication burden. [...]

AbstractAttribution is central to cybersecurity politics. It establishes a link between technical occurrences and political consequences by reducing the uncertainty about who

is behind an intrusion and what the likely intent was, ultimately creating cybersecurity “truths” with political consequences. [...]